Just recently as a nation we commemorated Anzac Day. We remembered the sacrifices of those who suffered and died in battle to safeguard the freedoms that we enjoy today. We indeed live in “the Lucky Country”, or better, “the Blessed Country”. We have ample resources, clean air and, above all, still a measure of basic freedoms and liberty. We should never forget that these blessings have been obtained through the blood, sweat and tears of many who have paid the ultimate sacrifice when these freedoms were under threat. Many of us are migrants and have been welcomed with open arms to share these blessings with other Australians.
Over the last few months, pastor Paul has been preaching through the The Epistle to the Hebrews in the Chinese congregation. Last week he explained to us the significance of Melchizedek, mentioned in Hebrews chapter 7. We received much enlightenment for reflection and application. The story of Melchizedek is recorded in one of the early chapters in the Bible, in Genesis chapter 14. We are all familiar with the context. Abraham and Lot (with their wives) had travelled all the way from Chaldee, according to the LORD’s call, to settle in the land of Canaan. However, not everything went smoothly.
The author of Hebrews tells us that Melchizedek was king of Salem as well as priest of the Most High God (Hebrews 7:1-3). On the one hand he was a political or civil ruler, but on the other hand he was also a priest or a religious leader. Political and spiritual authority were combined in his office. There was no demarcation between civil governance and spiritual authority. This of course has always been the case and will continue to be so. Any government, whether socialist or liberal, governs in accordance with its religion (i.e., its ideological worldview). Politics and spirituality are always intertwined.
The author of Hebrews also insightfully provides his Greek readers with an interpretation of the meaning of Melchizedek’s name and title. The name Melchizedek in Hebrew means “king of righteousness” and king of Salem means “king of peace” (Hebrews 7:1-3). The main story line of the Bible and Salvation History concerns the re-establishment of God’s kingdom peace (shalom) which was lost at the Fall. Our world is in desperate need of peace. In Hebrew peace or shalom does not just mean the absence of war or hostilities but also blessing and wholeness. But note that, according to the inspired order of the text, the “king of righteousness” comes before the “king of peace”. There cannot be any lasting peace without righteousness. Wrongs must be righted, debts must be paid, and justice must be established before there will be true peace in the world. All these truths are beautifully illustrated and fulfilled in the gospel of the Lord Jesus Christ, of whom Melchizedek was a type. Since Jesus paid our debt on the cross, satisfying the demand for righteousness, we may have peace with God (Rom 3:21-26; 5:1). These truths will be completely consummated at the return of the Lord Jesus when He will first judge and destroy all the enemies of the gospel and then deliver all God’s elect who cry out to Him day and night (2 Thess 1:9-10). Christ is King of Kings, and all authority has been given to Him in heaven and on the earth. Therefore, the Bible counsels all rulers to “kiss the Son lest He be angry” (Psalm 2:12) and insists that “every knee should bow … and every tongue confess that Jesus Christ is Lord” (Phil 2:9-11). This inevitably involves politics.
The story of Melchizedek also reminds us of Abraham who rescued Lot from the marauding four kings of the north (see Genesis 14). When Abraham heard that Lot was captured and taken away with all his goods, he immediately sprang into action and marshalled a trained force of 318 men. Abraham pursued the kidnappers, attacked them, defeated them, and rescued Lot. Then after his successful military campaign, Melchizedek, the priest of the Most High God, blessed him. God enabled Abraham to obtain the victory and save his nephew Lot. Abraham, the father of the faithful, was not a passivist but bravely confronted aggressors to protect his family.
We are certainly not advocates for war, knowing that peacemakers are blessed (Matt 5:9) and that those who live by the sword will die by the sword (Matt 26:52). But we do need to read the whole Bible and be informed by church history. At times, war is necessary to defeat evil and protect family and freedom. Over the last 50 years the church has been heavily influenced with passivist ideologies. A few weeks ago even the pope made the silly comment that God does not listen to the prayers of those who are engaged in warfare. As we mentioned at the beginning of this reflection concerning Anzac Day, if the free world did not oppose Hitler and Hirohito during the Second World War, Australia now would have been either a German or Japanese police state. If the Crusaders did not defend Europe from Islam during the Middle Ages the whole world would probably have been overrun by a Muslim caliphate.
In conclusion, I would like to propose three points of application. Firstly, we, especially our older folks since we grew up in a more congenial environment, need to realise that things have changed; western society is not just no longer Christian but has become anti-Christian. In the West, our culture has been hugely influenced by the Bible and Christianity. Because of Christianity, we have valued inalienable human rights, such as equality, right to private property, freedom of expression, liberty of the conscience, and freedom of association and belief. However, around 40 years ago, in the 1980s, things began to change. Through the influence of neo-Marxism, more and more educators propagated the ideas of secularism, multiculturalism and pluralism. Those who have gone through this educational system are now in charge of our institutions and have replaced our traditional Christian worldview with an anti-Christian one.
Secondly, the church needs to address these issues and expose the idols of multiculturalism and pluralism. Over the last few decades the church has by and large ignored these social changes and has failed to address these political issues. The church cannot exist in a corner, ignoring politics. Certainly, the church is not political in terms of aligning itself with any particular political party, but at the same time the church is not apolitical. We are to be salt and light. The Old Testament prophets, Jesus and the apostles had many words for political leaders, Jews and Gentiles alike. They did not shy away from speaking God’s truth. The church needs to hold government to account and witness in the public square. Like our Anabaptist forefathers, we always need to insist on the separation of church and state (the two-fold office of Melchizedek prefigures Christ not the church), but this does not mean that the state is a law unto itself. Church and state are distinct spheres of authority, but both come under the jurisdiction of the Lord Jesus Christ. Governments must acknowledge Christ’s authority and rule in accordance with God’s commandments. If not, we will always end up with oppression, corruption and chaos. We need to expose the myth of neutrality and destroy the idols of multiculturalism and pluralism.
Thirdly, the church needs to equip believers to know how to navigate the myriads of social and political challenges that we face today. Many churches have censured its members from raising political issues fearing division. Since the church has failed in recent years to address matters of social ethics, Christians have been shaped by non-biblical worldviews and secular influencers. Science teaches us that nature does not like vacuums, so too Jesus taught us that unless the purified heart is filled with God’s truth, worse demons will come in and occupy the space. We cannot restrict ourselves to messages of personal piety while the world around us is disintegrating. Just last month the Canadian government passed legislation, after debate was banned, where a person could be charged with hate speech by quoting portions of the Bible. The same thing will happen here in Australia, unless we repent. Christians again should become familiar with the whole Bible and use it in daily life and witness. The pen is mightier than the sword, especially the styli that wrote the infallible words of God’s holy book. Christian social ethics, the Ten Commandments, should again be read and taught in our churches.
According to the Great Commission, we need to disciple the nations (Matt 28:18-20). Countries, including Australia, need to be Christianised. We need to teach and obey all of Jesus’ commandments in every area of life, privately and publicly, when it is convenient and when it is not convenient. Discipleship is not for cowards but for overcomers and the forceful. This is our present need. We need to proclaim that Christ is the true King of Righteousness and the Prince of Peace. Sooner or later Christ Himself will return to judge all those who disobey the gospel and create a world in which righteousness dwells, resulting in eternal peace.
3 Comments
Jimmy
Very insightful and current topic, Pastor Johan. Multiculturalism and pluralism are plagues designed by the corrupt rulers of this world to undermine Christian nations. Having grown up in a Hindu-dominant society, I have witnessed and experienced the filthiness of such backward and pagan ideologies first-hand – Indian history and the work of Christian missionaries attests it. There is not one day that passes by that I do not scour social media on how these demonic religions and their followers are dominating in the West in politics and other walks of life. Do we need pagans to teach us good governance? You have rightly noted in your article on how Christians shy away from politics, and that is part of the problem. The Lord has called us to evangelise everyone we meet, and it needs to happen urgently. God bless you, Pastor Johan. We are going to miss you!
Tin Chung
The way I read the story of Melchizedek in Genesis 14 and Hebrews 7:1-3 where Melchizedek was portraited as both a political leader and the high priest whereby both political and religious authority was merged into one office of his. All these adumbrated the office of Christ in His second coming in the Millennium when Christ shall be the King of righteousness and King of peace. The question needed to be asked is that are today Christians resign to do nothing and waiting for the coming of this Millennium, far be it as far as the Bible is concerned. Throughout the Bible God have never ceased to send prophets to His people in OT times and in NT times there is the word of God and the Holy Spirit to guard and guide us to live in the ways of God.
I totally agree with Pastor Johan that today Christians should do more than just preaching the word of God but should also have a role in holding the government accountable. The latter can be practiced in all democratic governments though there remained certain resistance as we can see in days of the ministry of Jesus Christ on earth. However, it would be quite impossible in the tyrannical communist regime or government like China and Russia where any opposition to government is branded a form of subversion liable to be prosecuted under the grandstanding of national security law.
Another aspect is the churches nowadays have done very little apart from preaching the word of God. I can see that those who come out of the seminaries have been fully equipped with the word of God and yet their applications were very much lacking. Are Christians to accumulate all this knowledge of God for self-satisfaction? There is a saying that the longest distance in this world is not any marathon or cross-country adventure, it is the distance between the mind and heart of a person because it can take the entire lifetime of a person for the knowledge in the mind to be permeated into one’s heart. Until the word of God is one’s heart, one will never act it out as Luke said in the Gospel according to Luke, “The good person out of the good treasure of his heart produces good, and the evil person out of his evil treasure produces evil, for out of the abundance of the heart his mouth speaks.” (Lk 6:45) In other words, until the word of God is embedded in one’s heart one will never be able to act it out according to His will. On this note I personally recommend the reading of the following books by Dr. Carl Trueman, a historian and a theologian, and he made some very helpful advises to the practice of today churches:
The Rise and Triumph of the Modern Self
Strange New World
The Desecration of Man
As Pastor Johan often reminded us in his lectures on Church History that there remained a lot for us Christians today to learn from the practices of the early church. Shall surely miss you about church history in HBC.
Carmen
Thank you for your insight and teaching. Your words really resonated with me because they reflect the reality of the situation so clearly. Your teaching has been both encouraging and helpful, and I am truly grateful.